This More section has been specifically designed to help contextualise content being produced by nio kvinnor so it becomes easier-to-understand, even where the research paths involved and concepts being used are novel, groundbreaking, and in some cases necessarily complex (though not complicated).

• The current document which is using these tools is a slide-deck being developed and delivered specifically for an investor-network with physical locations across Germany, and with existing software-development relationships primarily based around personnel and workforces located in Eastern Europe.

• The goal of the deck itself, as defined by our interlocutor, is to identify a clear product vision to attract a co-founder or co-founders, alongside the investor or investors themselves.

• He has given us 9 points he needs us to address to achieve this initial goal. This explains why the second deck in this series has increased from 10 slides to 26.

Whilst the presentation under discussion covers a lot of ground in 26 slides, what we might call a “web-snippet contextualisation” tool which allows for & supports diverse people’s different learning styles — both those readers & eventual investors who prefer to know everything before first contact, alongside those who like to see a project where the bare bones are all they need to see — is something I realised was an imperative.

My DNA is literally and figuratively diverse: this, if anything, is what two of the ideas I use most widely — intuition validation and SPTs (special purpose technology IT) — lend themselves profoundly to. And this is why from now on in, I aim to cater to two kinds of thinkers:

1. The first thinker (investor) believes everything must be known before first contact with the person making the “ask”: audit trails and historical thinking to the max, combined with brand-new, groundbreaking ways of making money out of IT and AI. All laid out in well-organised ways, that allow for deeper contextualisation at every stage and any stage.

2. The second thinker (investor) believes that they mostly need to know the capability of the person making the “ask” to compress, without significant loss, a project of real interest into twenty-six slides or less.

Both kinds of thinkers deserve a space on this planet. And from now on in, it’s to both I shall address my petitions.

Why — and how to — decide to find out more, in fact …